The first step of most people denying justice is not always fair first dispute the stats. The next step is to then justify the actions.
So lets sit back and believe why they stop blacks and hispanics. Is it the officers are going to stop certain people more than in certain areas? Is it possible an officer on patrol off Federal Blvd at night has a different vibe than a patrol officer driving down Carmel Valley Road? You want to say hopefully no but that would not be out of the realm of reasonableness.
The next question is why is the officer on more alert in certain areas than others? Of course some areas have higher crime rates than others. So do we just say “sucks to be you” when you live in a higher crime area and you get stopped more because police are on higher alert? Could the number be higher because the officer believed something more than rolling a stop sign was going on. So, when they observed that slight roll (that we most all do) and find out it was a normal joe do they just give the citation to cover their A$?
I do applaud the city for coming out with the report. The key will be whether there will be new techniques or training to curb this flaw.
The San Diego Police Department is trying to assess whether its officers are guilty of racial profiling in traffic stops, as some community activists allege.
Statistics released this week suggest that black and Latino drivers are more likely to be pulled over than white drivers, and once stopped are more likely to be searched than white drivers who have been stopped.
“We have a racial profiling issue; it is here,” Mark Jones, a former Marine and leader of the Black Students Justice Coalition, told the City Council committee that oversees the police department. “The data shows the problem exists.”
In 2014, of 144,164 traffic stops, Latino drivers represented 30.2% and African Americans 11.2%, compared to census data that Latinos are 27% of the city’s adult population and African Americans 5.5%. Of the 7,142 drivers who were searched, 40.1% were Latinos and 23.4% African American.
Police Chief Shelley Zimmerman noted the difficulty of using such statistics to reach conclusions about racial profiling.
Still, the numbers taken from traffic stop data collected by patrol officers were sufficiently troubling for council members to call for additional study, possibly by academic researchers, although previous outside studies have been inconclusive.
“Being an African American female, this weighs heavy on my heart,” said Councilwoman Myrtle Cole, a former lieutenant in the community college district police force.
Councilwoman Marti Emerald, chair of the council’s Public Safety and Livable Neighborhoods Committee, has asked the San Diego State University’s school of public affairs to “conduct an independent academic research study.” The goal, she said, “is to improve trust and relations between our communities and our police.”
The idea of an outside review was also suggested by the ACLU.
Margaret Dooley-Sammuli, policy director of the San Diego and Imperial counties chapter of the ACLU, said the numbers presented to the council committee “failed to identify or explain why data suggests disproportionate stops and discretionary searches.”
Only a deeper review will provide analysis “that is meaningful to the crucial conversation on policing in San Diego,” she said.
In August, she released a public service announcement encouraging motorists who believe they have been treated unfairly to speak up. She has ordered officers to stop routinely asking drivers whether they are on parole or probation and requiring drivers to sit on the curb while being questioned.
Zimmerman told the council committee that the department “is absolutely committed to the fair treatment of all members of our community.”
But the problem that stymied researchers a decade ago still persists, Zimmerman said: Census data do not include drivers who are undocumented, military members or visitors to San Diego from Mexico or elsewhere. As such, getting an accurate picture of the “driving population” for comparison is dubious, she said.
Zimmerman said she welcomes the idea of outside researchers and suggested they not just review the numbers but also interview officers and members of the community.
An update on the issue, including whether San Diego State will conduct a review, is planned for the committee’s March meeting.
“I know this is a tough subject,” Cole said, “but we need to continue addressing it, continue to talk about it, until this subject is eliminated at San Diego PD, period.”
The full article can be found here.
Hire a Proactive, affordable, and quality defense when you are facing San Diego DUI charges. Whether you have been charged of a Lakeside DUI, Lemon Grove DUI, National City DUI, Cardiff DUI, Racho Santa Fe San Diego DUI, Rancho Bernardo DUI, Spring Valley DUI, Solana Beach DUI, Leucadia DUI, Golden Hills DUI, North Park DUI, Torrey Pines DUI, Eastlake DUI, Paradise Valley DUI, San Diego DUI, Poway DUI, Chula Vista DUI, La Mesa DUI, Santee DUI, Mission Valley DUI, Clairemont DUI, Point Loma DUI, La Jolla DUI, Carmel Valley DUI, Mira Mesa DUI, Pacific Beach DUI, Del Mar DUI, Encinitas DUI, Oceanside DUI, Ocean Beach DUI, Escondido DUI, Vista DUI, San Marcos DUI, Carlsbad DUI, El Cajon DUI, San Diego Expungement, San Diego Bench Warrant, San Diego Failure to Appear, San Diego Restraining Orders, San Diego Terminate Probation, San Diego Minor Possession of Alcohol, San Diego Probation Violation, San Diego Prop 47, it is vital you need to hire an attorney who knows how to defend your rights and can determine if the government can prove their case. Contact the Law Office of Mark Deniz now for a free case evaluation at (858) 751-4384 or send an email to [email protected].