Unintended consequences… it is one of the most appropriate terms for a San Diego DUI. Does someone’s decision making need to be scrutinized by their employer if someone gets a San Diego DUI?
A San Diego DUI comes with so many penalties. Some of which happen while the individual walks into court.
I have written in previous articles about DMV license suspensions, San Diego DUI fines, and DUI education courses.
However, today we focus on an individual’s job. There are some professions (Nurses, teachers, police) who have to go through a process when receiving a San Diego DUI. Some jobs take it on a case-by-case basis. Should they? This is relevant with a career in the military as much as any other profession.
On one hand people would say that individual’s decision making is in question and it needs to be determined they should continue with their job. On the other hand, who here has not gone out and had a fun time? Could it be a borderline blood alcohol level and just a drive into checkpoint a few miles from home? Were they even impaired? Has the individual shown any signs of alcohol abuse or bad decision making before? The facts should be taken into consideration and not act with a knee-jerk reaction.
It is a valid argument and a case can be made for both sides. I as an employer would ensure that any criminal charge would be brought to my attention. We then would look over the facts to see if there are any flags. My heart goes out to those in the service because they have put so much into their career.
In any event, the unintended consequences of a San Diego DUI go far beyond the DMV and the courts. It can stretch all the way to your livelihood. Below is an article on the issue. Enjoy the day.
Jason king pledged to protect the people as a United States Marines serving at MCAS Miramar.
California Highway Patrol officers believe he killed two after driving drunk the wrong way on the 163 over the weekend and crashing into a car full of medical students.
“The sad thing about this is there are two families that are not going to have their loved one anymore,” CHP Officer Jake Sanchez, said.
Before Sanchez became an officer, he was a Marine. He said he saw service members letting loose after a long – and dry – deployment.
“Being in the military you just feel like you can’t be harmed,” Sanchez added.
Three years ago, a Camp Pendleton Marine was accused of drunk driving in a crash that killed three other Marines. It was one of dozens of crashes that hurt or killed Marines over the course of a few years.
Local military leaders took action. They started randomly giving Marines and sailors breathalyzer tests.
The Navy has made a big push with the “Keep What You’ve Earned” campaign, reminding sailors that a DUI could strip them of their rank or even end their service.
MCAS Miramar cannot control what happens off base, but seems to be doing everything possible on base to prevent drunk driving.
A Miramar base official sent this statement:
First and foremost, we send our deepest condolences to those affected by the accident, and our thoughts and prayers are with the victim’s family and friends. We take incidents of this nature very seriously. The Marine’s actions are not in keeping with the good order and discipline demanded of a U.S. Marine, and he will be appropriately held accountable for his actions.
The Marine Corps does not tolerate drinking and driving, and our leadership implements several initiatives to educate Marines in an effort to prevent drinking and driving. Some of these initiatives include designated driver programs, safety stand downs, quality leadership discussions and safety briefs, and substance abuse programs.
The civilian investigation is led by California Highway Patrol. The Marine Corps will cooperate with the local police during the investigation process.
“Hey, if you’re planning on going out and drinking, have a plan set up ahead of time. No good plan had ever been established under the influence,” Sanchez said.
The military members fight to save lives, and their leaders are fighting to ensure they do not claim anymore.
If you are charged with a San Diego DUI or other Criminal offense, you need to call our firm immediately. We are available to take action on your case today. Please email or call us at 858-751-4384 or email me at [email protected] to schedule a free consultation. The key is to be proactive.
The full article can be found here.
23152. (a) It is unlawful for a person who is under the influence of any alcoholic beverage to drive a vehicle. (b) It is unlawful for a person who has 0.08 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood to drive a vehicle. For purposes of this article and Section 34501.16, percent, by weight, of alcohol in a person’s blood is based upon grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. In any prosecution under this subdivision, it is a rebuttable presumption that the person had 0.08 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood at the time of driving the vehicle if the person had 0.08 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood at the time of the performance of a chemical test within three hours after the driving. (c) It is unlawful for a person who is addicted to the use of any drug to drive a vehicle. This subdivision shall not apply to a person who is participating in a narcotic treatment program approved pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 11875) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 10.5 of the Health and Safety Code. (d) It is unlawful for a person who has 0.04 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood to drive a commercial motor vehicle, as defined in Section 15210. In any prosecution under this subdivision, it is a rebuttable presumption that the person had 0.04 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood at the time of driving the vehicle if the person had 0.04 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood at the time of the performance of a chemical test within three hours after the driving. (e) It is unlawful for a person who is under the influence of any drug to drive a vehicle. (f) It is unlawful for a person who is under the combined influence of any alcoholic beverage and drug to drive a vehicle. (g) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2014.