This bill is ridiculous. I get it. There are instances in first time DUIs where someone needs the interlock ignition installed.
For others, at worst they made a bad choice to drink and drive and will never mix th two again. How often do peope re-offend in the one year the interlock would be on the car? DUI priors are usually years from their previous offense (for those offenders).
Do they want to talk about the cost for the court to make sure IIDs are in. This means more court documents. This means more people in court with issues with the interlock. All this means taxpayer dollars being used.
IID is on the table with 1st time DUIs in certain circumstances. I think that is the proper method. Making a mandatory IID will mean more trials because of the penalty. It will be interesting to see how this turns out.
State legislation that would require first-time drunken drivers to install an ignition interlock system in their vehicle gained the unanimous support of the San Diego County Board of Supervisors Tuesday.
The board voted 4-0, with Supervisor Ron Roberts absent, to send a letter of support for Senate Bill 1046, which was recently introduced in Sacramento.
If SB 1046 becomes law, it would expand a current four-county pilot program statewide by requiring anyone convicted of a single DUI offense to install a certified ignition interlock device on each vehicle they own or operate.
The device would measure the driver’s blood-alcohol content before unlocking the vehicle’s ignition system. If alcohol is detected on the driver’s breath, the car won’t start.
“I firmly believe that this legislation will help us provide another tool to help stop drunk driving before it starts,” Supervisor Dianne Jacob said.
Jacob was behind failed efforts in 2009 to have San Diego become one of the pilot counties. Alameda, Los Angeles, Sacramento and Tulare Counties were selected instead.
“Those counties have seen a reduction in fatalities since the program began,” said Steve Lykins, executive director of Mothers Against Drunk Driving in San Diego.
“We’re seeing so many people re-offend, this is the only way to prevent it,” Lykins said. “Drinking and driving is 100 percent preventable and yet we still see it.”
The bill was introduced in February by Sen. Jerry Hill, a Democrat from San Mateo County, with the backing of MADD, which plans to lobby vigorously for its passage.
The full article can be found here.